BCM 112

Why Copyright shouldn’t make ‘to copy’ wrong.

In short, all ideas created by individuals are subject to copyright and the monopoly of its creator. This is because theoretically, in the absence of fear that an individual’s ideas can be stolen, human creativity and innovation will flourish .However in realty, by attributing this idea of copyright to one of natural common sense,  Industry owners are using this facade to continually expand their control over ‘intellectual property’ whilst ironically undermining its theoretical benefit entirely.

By using Prezi I have gone into more depth about copyright’s fruition and its true effects despite its goal of innovative encouragement.


If you watched the Prezi, it should be clear now that because all ideas, no matter how original they may seem, are reformations of other ideas. Theoretically we are all subject to copyright infringement; Copyright is not enabling but strictly limiting an individual’s ability to create.

dr evil

Note: This is not my meme and if I don’t reference where it came from to show I am using it for educational purposes, I am committing copyright infringement- Just saying

Thus effectively what is happening is, whilst industries are utilising their exclusive rights to use a same idea over and over in order to maximise revenue (for e.g in a series of Hollywood Blockbuster films like Harry Potter) citizens are made to pay, sometimes very highly, to merely access and/or view the ideas that their use facilitates worth in. It doesn’t make sense right?

Something needs to be changed. 

Lastly in one last brain bubble of thought (just to prove how illogical copyright has become..) if Copyright really makes copying ‘not right’, then shouldn’t it be called Copywrong?

Thanks for reading,


P.s If you’re still in a little bit of a muddle as to what copyright actually is, this video may also be helpful to watch;


Content (in Prezi and Post):

Mitew, T., 2016, “Week 3: Watch, but don’t touch! Copyright structures and industry control”Lecture/Prezi Presentation, BCM 112, University of Wollongong, 14 March 2016

“1.13 Copyright Exceptions”. Smartcopying.edu.au. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

“Copyright Act 1968”. Legislation.gov.au. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

Siegal, Arthur. “Michigan Green Law | First Major Cleanup Law Changes In 15 Years Enacted”.Michigangreenlaw.com. N.p., 2010. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

“New Media And The Creative Industries”. Google Books. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

Cucco, Marco (2009), The promise is great: the blockbuster and the Hollywood economy, Media, Culture & Society, 31/2: 215 – 230. http://mcs.sagepub.com/content/31/2/215.full.pdf


“Copyrighted Character”. Drawception. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016. (Feauture image)

“Dukeo”. Dukeo. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

“Happy Birthday, Shakespeare!”. LitStack. N.p., 2014. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

“Pupps FREE Stuff – DISNEY Animated Gifs, Flash Games, Cartoon Clips And Clip Art”.Puppsfreestuff.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.

“The Wire – You Think You Know TV?”. YouTube. N.p., 2016. Web. 17 Mar. 2016.


4 thoughts on “Why Copyright shouldn’t make ‘to copy’ wrong.

  1. Hi Jade! I really loved this post and found it really easy to understand and follow. Your Prezi was really effective as it was structured as a visual timeline, and used colloquial language and a conversational tone to present your ideas. You also incorporated some really useful academic information that supported your argument that the copyright is actually suppressing the generation of new ideas. I totally agreed with that line of thought. Also, your title was really clever and immediately grabbed my attention!


  2. Hi Jade, I love the ideas you’ve professed in your blog post and prezi presentation. The flow of your writing allows it to be relatable and understandable and the timeline like prezi, almost storytelling was a real interesting but yet effective touch summarising the idea of Copyright. The resources are incredible and helped back up your arguments about copyright, particularly this line “citizens are made to pay, sometimes very high costs, to merely access and/or view the idea’s that they facilitate worth in” as it sums up your argument in a sophisticated way! Well done!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s